Andrew Miller wrote: > alan.ga...@dpag.ox.ac.uk wrote: >> We should be open and therefore allow people to go for whatever license >> they want. However, they should be made aware that by doing so, they >> take >> the risk of their model not being used, etc. This being said, some >> authors >> might still prefer that outcome to not having their model on the CellML >> repository? > > Allowing people the ability to choose other licenses is something that I > think can go into later releases of the repository; however, until then, > the simplest thing to do is just to require that people need to license > the model under the Creative Commons Attribution License.
Indeed, but what if they don't want or can't (whatever the reason)? Does it mean that the model can't be made available on PMR2? Hopefully not. Alan _______________________________________________ cellml-discussion mailing list cellml-discussion@cellml.org http://www.cellml.org/mailman/listinfo/cellml-discussion
