Den tis 21 apr. 2020 kl 07:29 skrev Eric Ivancich <ivanc...@redhat.com>:
> Please be certain to read the associated docs in both: > > doc/radosgw/orphans.rst > doc/man/8/rgw-orphan-list.rst > > so you understand the limitations and potential pitfalls. Generally this > tool will be a precursor to a large delete job, so understanding what’s > going on is important. > I look forward to your report! And please feel free to post additional > questions in this forum. > > Where are those? https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/master/doc/man/8 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/master/doc/radosgw don't seem to contain them in master. Nor in nautilus branch or octopus. This whole issue feels weird, rgw (or its users) produces dead fragments of mulitparts, orphans and whatnot that needs cleaning up sooner or later and the info we get is that the old cleaner isn't meant to be used, it hasn't worked for a long while, there is no fixed version, perhaps there is a script somewhere with caveats. This (slightly frustrated) issue is of course on top of "bi trim" "bilog trim" "mdlog trim" "usage trim" "datalog trim" "sync error trim" "gc process" "reshard stale-instances rm" that we rgw admins are supposed to know when to run, how often, what their quirks are and so on. 'Docs' for rgw means "datalog trim" --help says "trims the datalog", and the long version on the web would be "this operation trims the datalog" or something that doesn't add anything more. -- "Grumpy cat was an optimist" _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
