Hi I was looking into running the tool. The question is: Do I need to compile the whole Ceph? Or is there radosgw-admin available for download precompiled? A nightly build or sth?
Kind regards / Pozdrawiam, Katarzyna Myrek wt., 21 kwi 2020 o 09:57 Janne Johansson <icepic...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > > Den tis 21 apr. 2020 kl 07:29 skrev Eric Ivancich <ivanc...@redhat.com>: >> >> Please be certain to read the associated docs in both: >> >> doc/radosgw/orphans.rst >> doc/man/8/rgw-orphan-list.rst >> >> so you understand the limitations and potential pitfalls. Generally this >> tool will be a precursor to a large delete job, so understanding what’s >> going on is important. >> I look forward to your report! And please feel free to post additional >> questions in this forum. >> > > Where are those? > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/master/doc/man/8 > https://github.com/ceph/ceph/tree/master/doc/radosgw > don't seem to contain them in master. Nor in nautilus branch or octopus. > > This whole issue feels weird, rgw (or its users) produces dead fragments of > mulitparts, orphans and whatnot that needs cleaning up sooner or later and > the info we get is that the old cleaner isn't meant to be used, it hasn't > worked for a long while, there is no fixed version, perhaps there is a script > somewhere with caveats. This (slightly frustrated) issue is of course on top > of > "bi trim" > "bilog trim" > "mdlog trim" > "usage trim" > > "datalog trim" > > "sync error trim" > > "gc process" > > "reshard stale-instances rm" > > > > that we rgw admins are supposed to know when to run, how often, what their > quirks are and so on. > > > 'Docs' for rgw means "datalog trim" --help says "trims the datalog", and the > long version on the web would be "this operation trims the datalog" or > something that doesn't add anything more. > > > > > -- > > "Grumpy cat was an optimist" > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@ceph.io To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-le...@ceph.io
