In playing around with this a bit more, I noticed that the two users on the 
secondary node cant see each others buckets. Is this a problem?
> On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Craig Lewis <cle...@centraldesktop.com> wrote:
> 
>> I see you're running 0.80.5.  Are you using Apache 2.4?  There is a known 
>> issue with Apache 2.4 on the primary and replication.  It's fixed, just 
>> waiting for the next firefly release.  Although, that causes 40x errors with 
>> Apache 2.4, not 500 errors.
> It is apache 2.4, but I’m actually running 0.80.7 so I probably have that bug 
> fix?
> 
> 
> No, the unreleased 0.80.8 has the fix.
>  
>  
>> 
>> Have you verified that both system users can read and write to both 
>> clusters?  (Just make sure you clean up the writes to the slave cluster).
> Yes I can write everywhere and radosgw-agent isn’t getting any 403s like it 
> was earlier when I had mismatched keys. The .us-nh.rgw.buckets.index pool is 
> syncing properly, as are the users. It seems like really the only thing that 
> isn’t syncing is the .zone.rgw.buckets pool.
> 
> That's pretty much the same behavior I was seeing with Apache 2.4.
> 
> Try downgrading the primary cluster to Apache 2.2.  In my testing, the 
> secondary cluster could run 2.2 or 2.4.
Do you have a link to that bug#? I want to see if it gives me any clues. 

Aaron 

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com

Reply via email to