In playing around with this a bit more, I noticed that the two users on the secondary node cant see each others buckets. Is this a problem? > On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Craig Lewis <cle...@centraldesktop.com> wrote: > >> I see you're running 0.80.5. Are you using Apache 2.4? There is a known >> issue with Apache 2.4 on the primary and replication. It's fixed, just >> waiting for the next firefly release. Although, that causes 40x errors with >> Apache 2.4, not 500 errors. > It is apache 2.4, but I’m actually running 0.80.7 so I probably have that bug > fix? > > > No, the unreleased 0.80.8 has the fix. > > >> >> Have you verified that both system users can read and write to both >> clusters? (Just make sure you clean up the writes to the slave cluster). > Yes I can write everywhere and radosgw-agent isn’t getting any 403s like it > was earlier when I had mismatched keys. The .us-nh.rgw.buckets.index pool is > syncing properly, as are the users. It seems like really the only thing that > isn’t syncing is the .zone.rgw.buckets pool. > > That's pretty much the same behavior I was seeing with Apache 2.4. > > Try downgrading the primary cluster to Apache 2.2. In my testing, the > secondary cluster could run 2.2 or 2.4. Do you have a link to that bug#? I want to see if it gives me any clues.
Aaron
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
