Well I upgraded both clusters to giant this morning just to see if that would help, and it didn’t. I have a couple questions though. I have the same regionmap on both clusters, with both zones in it, but then i only have the buckets and zone info for one zone in each cluster, is this right? Or do I need all the buckets and zones in both clusters? Reading the docs it doesn’t seem like i do because I’m expecting data to sync from one zone in one cluster to the other zone on the other cluster, but I don’t know what to think anymore.
Also do both users need to be system users on both ends? Aaron > On Nov 12, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Craig Lewis <cle...@centraldesktop.com> wrote: > > http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9206 <http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9206> > > My post to the ML: http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg12665.html > <http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg12665.html> > > > IIRC, the system uses didn't see the other user's bucket in a bucket listing, > but they could read and write the objects fine. > > > > On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Aaron Bassett <aa...@five3genomics.com > <mailto:aa...@five3genomics.com>> wrote: > In playing around with this a bit more, I noticed that the two users on the > secondary node cant see each others buckets. Is this a problem? > > IIRC, the system user couldn't see each other's buckets, but they could read > and write the objects. >> On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Craig Lewis <cle...@centraldesktop.com >> <mailto:cle...@centraldesktop.com>> wrote: >> >>> I see you're running 0.80.5. Are you using Apache 2.4? There is a known >>> issue with Apache 2.4 on the primary and replication. It's fixed, just >>> waiting for the next firefly release. Although, that causes 40x errors >>> with Apache 2.4, not 500 errors. >> It is apache 2.4, but I’m actually running 0.80.7 so I probably have that >> bug fix? >> >> >> No, the unreleased 0.80.8 has the fix. >> >> >>> >>> Have you verified that both system users can read and write to both >>> clusters? (Just make sure you clean up the writes to the slave cluster). >> Yes I can write everywhere and radosgw-agent isn’t getting any 403s like it >> was earlier when I had mismatched keys. The .us-nh.rgw.buckets.index pool is >> syncing properly, as are the users. It seems like really the only thing that >> isn’t syncing is the .zone.rgw.buckets pool. >> >> That's pretty much the same behavior I was seeing with Apache 2.4. >> >> Try downgrading the primary cluster to Apache 2.2. In my testing, the >> secondary cluster could run 2.2 or 2.4. > Do you have a link to that bug#? I want to see if it gives me any clues. > > Aaron > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
