http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/9206
My post to the ML: http://www.spinics.net/lists/ceph-users/msg12665.html IIRC, the system uses didn't see the other user's bucket in a bucket listing, but they could read and write the objects fine. On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Aaron Bassett <aa...@five3genomics.com> wrote: > In playing around with this a bit more, I noticed that the two users on > the secondary node cant see each others buckets. Is this a problem? > IIRC, the system user couldn't see each other's buckets, but they could read and write the objects. > On Nov 11, 2014, at 6:56 PM, Craig Lewis <cle...@centraldesktop.com> > wrote: > > I see you're running 0.80.5. Are you using Apache 2.4? There is a known >> issue with Apache 2.4 on the primary and replication. It's fixed, just >> waiting for the next firefly release. Although, that causes 40x errors >> with Apache 2.4, not 500 errors. >> >> It is apache 2.4, but I’m actually running 0.80.7 so I probably have that >> bug fix? >> >> > No, the unreleased 0.80.8 has the fix. > > > >> >> Have you verified that both system users can read and write to both >> clusters? (Just make sure you clean up the writes to the slave cluster). >> >> Yes I can write everywhere and radosgw-agent isn’t getting any 403s like >> it was earlier when I had mismatched keys. The .us-nh.rgw.buckets.index >> pool is syncing properly, as are the users. It seems like really the only >> thing that isn’t syncing is the .zone.rgw.buckets pool. >> > > That's pretty much the same behavior I was seeing with Apache 2.4. > > Try downgrading the primary cluster to Apache 2.2. In my testing, the > secondary cluster could run 2.2 or 2.4. > > Do you have a link to that bug#? I want to see if it gives me any clues. > > Aaron > >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
