Tyler, E5-2660 V2 is a 10-core, 2.2Ghz, giving you roughly 44Ghz or 0.78Ghz per OSD. That seems to fall in line with Nick's "golden rule" or 0.5Ghz - 1Ghz per OSD.
Are you doing EC or Replication? If EC, what profile? Could you also provide an average of CPU utilization? I'm still researching, but so far, the ratio seems to be pretty realistic. -John On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:22 AM, Tyler Bishop < tyler.bis...@beyondhosting.net> wrote: > We use dual E5-2660 V2 with 56 6T and performance has not been an issue. > It will easily saturate the 40G interfaces and saturate the spindle io. > > And yes, you can run dual servers attached to 30 disk each. This gives > you lots of density. Your failure domain will remain as individual > servers. The only thing shared is the quad power supplies. > > Tyler Bishop > Chief Technical Officer > 513-299-7108 x10 > > > > tyler.bis...@beyondhosting.net > > > If you are not the intended recipient of this transmission you are > notified that disclosing, copying, distributing or taking any action in > reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nick Fisk" <n...@fisk.me.uk> > To: "Василий Ангапов" <anga...@gmail.com>, "Tyler Bishop" < > tyler.bis...@beyondhosting.net> > Cc: ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 8:24:33 AM > Subject: RE: [ceph-users] Recomendations for building 1PB RadosGW with > Erasure Code > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Василий Ангапов [mailto:anga...@gmail.com] > > Sent: 16 February 2016 13:15 > > To: Tyler Bishop <tyler.bis...@beyondhosting.net> > > Cc: Nick Fisk <n...@fisk.me.uk>; <ceph-users@lists.ceph.com> <ceph- > > us...@lists.ceph.com> > > Subject: Re: [ceph-users] Recomendations for building 1PB RadosGW with > > Erasure Code > > > > 2016-02-16 17:09 GMT+08:00 Tyler Bishop > > <tyler.bis...@beyondhosting.net>: > > > With ucs you can run dual server and split the disk. 30 drives per > node. > > > Better density and easier to manage. > > I don't think I got your point. Can you please explain it in more > details? > > I think he means that the 60 bays can be zoned, so you end up with > physically 1 JBOD split into two 30 logical JBOD's each connected to a > different server. What this does to your failures domains is another > question. > > > > > And again - is dual Xeon's power enough for 60-disk node and Erasure > Code? > > I would imagine yes, but you would mostly likely need to go for the > 12-18core versions with a high clock. These are serious $$$$. I don't know > at what point this becomes more expensive than 12 disk nodes with "cheap" > Xeon-D's or Xeon E3's. > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list > ceph-users@lists.ceph.com > http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com >
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@lists.ceph.com http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
