Thank you for detailed explanation!
Got one another doubt,
This is the total space available in the cluster :
TOTAL : 23490G
Use : 10170G
Avail : 13320G
But ecpool shows max avail as just 3 TB. What am I missing ?
==========
$ ceph df
GLOBAL:
SIZE AVAIL RAW USED %RAW USED
23490G 13338G 10151G 43.22
POOLS:
NAME ID USED %USED MAX AVAIL OBJECTS
ostemplates 1 162G 2.79 1134G 42084
imagepool 34 122G 2.11 1891G 34196
cvm1 54 8058 0 1891G 950
ecpool1 55 4246G 42.77 3546G 1232590
$ ceph osd df
ID CLASS WEIGHT REWEIGHT SIZE USE AVAIL %USE VAR PGS
0 ssd 1.86469 1.00000 1909G 625G 1284G 32.76 0.76 201
1 ssd 1.86469 1.00000 1909G 691G 1217G 36.23 0.84 208
2 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 587G 306G 65.67 1.52 156
11 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 631G 262G 70.68 1.63 186
3 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 605G 288G 67.73 1.56 165
14 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 635G 258G 71.07 1.64 177
4 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 419G 474G 46.93 1.08 127
15 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 373G 521G 41.73 0.96 114
16 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 492G 401G 55.10 1.27 149
5 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 288G 605G 32.25 0.74 87
6 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 342G 551G 38.28 0.88 102
7 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 300G 593G 33.61 0.78 93
22 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 343G 550G 38.43 0.89 104
8 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 267G 626G 29.90 0.69 77
9 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 376G 518G 42.06 0.97 118
10 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 322G 571G 36.12 0.83 102
19 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 339G 554G 37.95 0.88 109
12 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 360G 534G 40.26 0.93 112
13 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 404G 489G 45.21 1.04 120
20 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 342G 551G 38.29 0.88 103
23 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 148G 745G 16.65 0.38 61
17 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 423G 470G 47.34 1.09 117
18 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 403G 490G 45.18 1.04 120
21 ssd 0.87320 1.00000 894G 444G 450G 49.67 1.15 130
TOTAL 23490G 10170G 13320G 43.30
Karun Josy
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:42 AM, Karun Josy <karunjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you for detailed explanation!
>
> Got one another doubt,
>
> This is the total space available in the cluster :
>
> TOTAL 23490G
> Use 10170G
> Avail : 13320G
>
>
> But ecpool shows max avail as just 3 TB.
>
>
>
> Karun Josy
>
> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 1:06 AM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> No, I would only add disks to 1 failure domain at a time. So in your
>> situation where you're adding 2 more disks to each node, I would recommend
>> adding the 2 disks into 1 node at a time. Your failure domain is the
>> crush-failure-domain=host. So you can lose a host and only lose 1 copy of
>> the data. If all of your pools are using the k=5 m=3 profile, then I would
>> say it's fine to add the disks into 2 nodes at a time. If you have any
>> replica pools for RGW metadata or anything, then I would stick with the 1
>> host at a time.
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 2:29 PM Karun Josy <karunjo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for your reply!
>>>
>>> I am using erasure coded profile with k=5, m=3 settings
>>>
>>> $ ceph osd erasure-code-profile get profile5by3
>>> crush-device-class=
>>> crush-failure-domain=host
>>> crush-root=default
>>> jerasure-per-chunk-alignment=false
>>> k=5
>>> m=3
>>> plugin=jerasure
>>> technique=reed_sol_van
>>> w=8
>>>
>>>
>>> Cluster has 8 nodes, with 3 disks each. We are planning to add 2 more on
>>> each nodes.
>>>
>>> If I understand correctly, then I can add 3 disks at once right ,
>>> assuming 3 disks can fail at a time as per the ec code profile.
>>>
>>> Karun Josy
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 12:06 AM, David Turner <drakonst...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Depending on how well you burn-in/test your new disks, I like to only
>>>> add 1 failure domain of disks at a time in case you have bad disks that
>>>> you're adding. If you are confident that your disks aren't likely to fail
>>>> during the backfilling, then you can go with more. I just added 8 servers
>>>> (16 OSDs each) to a cluster with 15 servers (16 OSDs each) all at the same
>>>> time, but we spent 2 weeks testing the hardware before adding the new nodes
>>>> to the cluster.
>>>>
>>>> If you add 1 failure domain at a time, then any DoA disks in the new
>>>> nodes will only be able to fail with 1 copy of your data instead of across
>>>> multiple nodes.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 12:54 PM Karun Josy <karunjo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Is it recommended to add OSD disks one by one or can I add couple of
>>>>> disks at a time ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Current cluster size is about 4 TB.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Karun
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> ceph-users mailing list
>>>>> ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
>>>>> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@lists.ceph.com
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
