<snip>GEL:No no no Dances with Horsies..
you can do HTML AND WYSIWYG with Dreamweaver just as well.
----------
<snip>ERI*K*A
6) Found myself viewing and editing HTML in the HTML window far too often,
might as well of done it in Studio.
--------------------------------------------
Oh, Gel-ly muffin, *** ruffles hair **** did you read my number 6? If I am
going to edit my code in an HTML window, I might as well use Studio.
<CF_ULTRA_RANT>
I thought it was a pain to use both windows. But, it's all a matter of
personal preference anyway....I am quite used to (and quick on the draw I
might add) switching between a browser and Studio to see my results. This is
also more *lifelike* than viewing results in an UltraDev window. :)
I also typically have both Netscape and IE going at the same time so I can
check along the way. There is nothing more annoying than spending 5 hours
getting a page perfect only to have Netscape murder it. (and that preview in
browser window mode in UltraDev?! Peshaw,...pain in the a**. Shows you a doc
from a temp file...it's not coming from the web server, pain, pain, pain.
</CF_ULTRA_RANT>
However.....like I said...great for throwing up the nephew's website or
something for the neighbor down the street! <grin>
Erika
(with a *K*)
"Blessed are they who can laugh at themselves, for they shall never cease to
be amused."
-----Original Message-----
From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2001 6:09 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Opps... I posted this on CF-Talk first Sorry
No no no Dances with Horsies..
you can do HTML AND WYSIWYG with Dreamweaver just as well.
You can split the window betwenn HTML and WYSIWYG and edit in code, or
WYSIWYG and see the effects of the changes inr eal time.
I have done this when editing the layout of tables that return rows of
results..and it is AMAZING! :)
How come you don't just love this feature?
You go in there an dadd a <td></td> with a CFOUTUPUT in it..and then you can
click Live View ...and you see the resutls RIGHT THERE!
I am liking Ultradev more and more each day...but becuase it does not have
the auto-insert-tag support of CF Studio, I use CF Studio to do my code, and
Ultradev to do the look and feel.
PLUS!
There are lots of coolicious Developer .mdx files that are available now for
Ultradev,which will autocreate Insert forms and such and such..which CAN be
a decent timesaver.
I never liked WYSIWYG either..but that was before Ultradev. that said, I
think the focus of CF Studio and Ultradev are still too different for them
to be merged into one product. If they do that, the thing will be too huge
and unwieldly to use..or they will have to cut out several features from one
or the other.
Actually....*I* can think of a decent way to do it...but I doubt Macromedia
could.
*preens*
*blows fingernails and rubs against shirt*
*passes hand through hair*
-Gel
^_^
hee hee hee
-----Original Message-----
From: Erika L Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The Cons:
1) It's a WYSIWYG
2) It's a WYSIWYG
3) Ok, I hate WYSIWYG's
4) Looking at your ColdFusion pages when you use an include is horrible.
5) Trying to convert an existing hand coded site to UltraDev is a nightmare,
and I gave up.
6) Found myself viewing and editing HTML in the HTML window far too often,
might as well of done it in Studio.
7) I do alot of scaled sites and working with 100% table widths in UltraDev
wasn't easy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-community@houseoffusion.com/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
