I recently watched a tv program where labor was induced early so the mother could begin chemotherapy. It was a sad show. She found out about the breast cancer after she concieved. I personally would have aborted the fetus and started chemo right away.
----- Original Message -----
From: dana tierney
To: CF-Community
Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: Conversation Topic - Abortion
He's an agnostic. Viability is a reasonable place to draw a line, if you want my opinion. You could quarrel with this if so inclined, but let's not. What, in your opinion, should happen post-viability if the mother wants an abortion or wants to do something that poses a risk to the baby? Chemotherapy let's say? Or sky-diving? Enlistment? Driving a car?
Feel free to jump in here, John :)
Dana
> And John, do you have a religion?
> To me its common sense that a fetus that lives inside its mother and
> cannot live outside is NOT a baby.
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: John Stanley
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 3:48 PM
> Subject: RE: Conversation Topic - Abortion
>
>
> >>Dana, calling "abortion" "murdering our children" is a religious
> > concept, imo, not common sensical. A fetus is not a "child".
>
> I believe I said it was murdering children. This is not a religious
> concept
> to me. It IS common sense. If you are pregnant and you choose to end
> the
> pregnancy by abortion, then you are murdering your child. To me, life
> begins
> upon conception. There is also a double standard here, when some
> people
> argue for abortion, they claim that the fetus is not a child, but then
> when
> they get the news that their sister/cousin/friend just had a
> miscarriage,
> they rush over to confort them when they lost their baby. If it's not
> a
> baby, you should tell them on the phone, "hey, toughen up. It's not a
> baby,
> it's just a collection of cells" yeah, right.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
