The decision does not affect me but I can see some implications that I
really don't like. Suppose... a child is being abused at school and a
cutodial parent is not intervening? For example?
Dana
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 23:05:03 -0400
Subject: Re: Speaking of church and state
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Think of it Dana, that decision means that any non-custodial parent
now cannot sue on behalf of their kid. You can stretch the decision a
bit and possibly remove all rights from non-custodial parents.
larry
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 18:32:04 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> yeah, really.
>
> On Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:31:57 -0400, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > But by doing that that decision
> > opens up all sorts of other problems in divorce and child custody law.
>
>________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
