the alter back then. Pastors were speaking out for for change all over the
place.
While I agree that we need to ensure that we don't allow government to push
religion, not allowing religion it's voice in all things, politics included,
seems to go directly against what the founders wanted.
We know that Catholics and most Christians are very prolife, should they
have to stop? Should Muslims be disallowed from commenting on our defense
policies because of overlap?
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 04, 2004 10:44 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: Bush Campaign Seeks Help From Church Congregations
I was thinking more in terms of endorsing candidates and by
implication candidates endorsing a particular religious viewpoint.
larry
On Sun, 4 Jul 2004 03:04:59 -0400, Judith Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Larry, it may violate the church's tax-exempt status, but how is trying
to fund-raise in a church against the constitution?
>
> Please explain this.
>
> Judith
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> > We're talking about the current campaign. In case its difficult for
> > you to read, the date on the article was one month ago (June 3, 2004)
> > not 4 years ago. Moreover the democrat have not actively tried to
> > breech the separation of church and state. I have no wish to see that
> > this nation becomes a theocracy.
> >
> > Going to a church is a person's right guarenteed by the constitution.
> > Actively involving churches in the political process is against the
> > constitution.
> >
> > larry
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
