> find him. Adding "will not" would be redundant unless
> it was meant as an intentionaly will not.
> At least that's how I read it. If I read it wrong ,
> again sorry.
"Won't" in this context could mean either an active choice (I will do
something.) or a result (what will happen). But even if it is the
active choice, she doesn't attribute a reason. We all know that there
are many reasons for things that happen in Washington that are never
made public. To jump to the extreme conclusion that it meant an active
collaboration with bin Laden or in planning 9/11 borders on paranoia.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
