conclusion?
If it�s so paranoid ask her what she did mean.
I on the other hand would like to let this dead horse
lie.
-sm
--- Kevin Graeme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The "can not" covers the fact that he's not able
> to
> > find him. Adding "will not" would be redundant
> unless
> > it was meant as an intentionaly will not.
> > At least that's how I read it. If I read it wrong
> ,
> > again sorry.
>
> "Won't" in this context could mean either an active
> choice (I will do
> something.) or a result (what will happen). But even
> if it is the
> active choice, she doesn't attribute a reason. We
> all know that there
> are many reasons for things that happen in
> Washington that are never
> made public. To jump to the extreme conclusion that
> it meant an active
> collaboration with bin Laden or in planning 9/11
> borders on paranoia.
>
> -Kevin
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
