fair enough. I really got to go but the problem with this though is
the extreme number of unfree nations out there. Why Iraq as opposed to
::shrug:: the Sudan or South Korea or erm... Iraq. For example.

Dana

----- Original Message -----
From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:15:44 -0400
Subject: RE: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

You are correct, that is not the reason the government gave for invading
Iraq, it is however the reason why I supported the invasion of Iraq.

I differ greatly with the publicly given reasons from the government.

I believe that all nations should be free, and that it is the responsibility
of free nations to do what ever is in their power to see to that.

  _____  

From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 3:41 PM

To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.

I am not sure. But that was a) not why we said we were invading Iraq
and b) almost certainly not why we did invade Iraq. If some good came
of it well, good :) but this does not mean that what did happen should
have happened. Or else why not invade the Sudan again?

Dana________________________________
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to