On Thu, 8 Jul 2004 14:29:29 -0600, dana tierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> fair enough. I really got to go but the problem with this though is
> the extreme number of unfree nations out there. Why Iraq as opposed to
> ::shrug:: the Sudan or South Korea or erm... Iraq. For example.
>
> Dana
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2004 16:15:44 -0400
> Subject: RE: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
> To: CF-Community <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> You are correct, that is not the reason the government gave for invading
> Iraq, it is however the reason why I supported the invasion of Iraq.
>
> I differ greatly with the publicly given reasons from the government.
>
> I believe that all nations should be free, and that it is the responsibility
> of free nations to do what ever is in their power to see to that.
>
> _____
>
> From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 08, 2004 3:41 PM
>
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: 9/11 Commission to Cheney - You're still wrong.
>
> I am not sure. But that was a) not why we said we were invading Iraq
> and b) almost certainly not why we did invade Iraq. If some good came
> of it well, good :) but this does not mean that what did happen should
> have happened. Or else why not invade the Sudan again?
>
> Dana________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
