> What a silly argument. The same could be said for any sex that is not
> for procreation. Do you wish to ban any sex that is not for
> procreation? Are you actively campaigning for a constitutional
> amendment to ban hummers?
Not to mention Tony Weeg deriving orgasms from his desk... this truly is
unnatural and the government should act now on this important issue.
OR:
Don't get M. Tangorre started on those over sized SUV's....
Realistically, this is where I tend to deviate from the typical
Republican party line. Religion. I just don't believe in such things
and have a hard time with any legislation based on it. More important
then the laws prohibiting Gay marriage and Abortion however is the law
prohibiting me from buying beer on my way to a Sunday golf outing or
boat trip. That's just evil.
I liked the argument earlier that natural selection will take care of
the problem, but religious types don't believe in natural selection do
they? If not this could never be a valid argument for them.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
