allows/endorses homosexual unions that way the government couldn't make a
law that favors one religion over another?
Marlon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Stoner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 9:27 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Senate rejects move to ban same-sex marriage
>
> Jerry Johnson wrote:
>
> > What a silly argument. The same could be said for any sex that is not
> > for procreation. Do you wish to ban any sex that is not for
> > procreation? Are you actively campaigning for a constitutional
> > amendment to ban hummers?
>
> Not to mention Tony Weeg deriving orgasms from his desk... this truly is
> unnatural and the government should act now on this important issue.
>
> OR:
>
> Don't get M. Tangorre started on those over sized SUV's....
>
> Realistically, this is where I tend to deviate from the typical
> Republican party line. Religion. I just don't believe in such things
> and have a hard time with any legislation based on it. More important
> then the laws prohibiting Gay marriage and Abortion however is the law
> prohibiting me from buying beer on my way to a Sunday golf outing or
> boat trip. That's just evil.
>
> I liked the argument earlier that natural selection will take care of
> the problem, but religious types don't believe in natural selection do
> they? If not this could never be a valid argument for them.
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
