I don't think he said majority. Pretty hard to argue the proposition
that there have been some.
But while we are here, I think it matters that these pedophiles have
finally been dealt with. Should have been dealt with sooner, sure, but
can any other religious group say that it has cleaned house?
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 19:47:12 -0400, Angel Stewart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then so too the teachings of all religions.
> As within them all there are those that would subvert the religion, or
> those that go against it's teachings.
>
>
> Do you have any figures to back your claims about the majority of the
> Roman Catholic priesthood being homosexual perverts?
> Or is this just a baseless accusation.
>
>
> I would go with the latter, since at question was simply whether or not
> the church condones Homosexuality.
>
>
> -Gel
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Doug White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If this is the case, then the Pope and the Roman Catholic Church
> should start
> doing their housekeeping right at home within the ranks of the
> priesthood. If
> they would do that, you would not have Archdiocese having to either
> declare
> bankruptcy or sell of assets which were given to them by their
> parishoners just
> because they cannot bring themselves to stop protecting the homosexual
> perverts
> within their own institutions. huh?
>
> Being that hippocritical, It would not seem that the teachings of the
> Church
> on Morality holds much water.________________________________
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
