and wasn't  David Corresh (SP?) denied the right to bear arms or did I miss
the real reason they went in on him?


OR am I misunderstanding this amendment.

Amendment II

A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state,
the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

Sorry guys I can't stop reading this :)
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to