Why can't it be both?

I sort of think that we as humans are a little more emotionally complex and less survivalistic (is that a word) than, say, a hyena in the wild that can't go to Trader Joe's and get Organic Chicken.

Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
The Children's Medical Center
One Children's Plaza
Dayton, OH 45404
937-641-4293

http://www.childrensdayton.org

"There is no right price for the wrong product, even if it is inexpensive and delivered on time."

>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 7/22/2004 4:03:47 PM >>>

well wait a second, is there a "natural food chain" or is it "God intended" ?

because i'll gaurantee you this, Nature alone doesn't care two licks about what is humane, or how something suffers before it dies.

The argument generally goes that human's are the only animal advanced enough to understand what it means to act "humanely", as such it is our responsibility to do so.  But where does that responsibility come from? Most point to God, because Nature alone bestows no responsibility on us whatsoever, besides survive, survive, survive.

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Candace Cottrell
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:53 PM
  Subject: RE: Vegetarians or Organic Foods

  To me it does. I believe that there is a natural food chain/circle of predators and prey. I believe that God intended for animals to sustain themselves upon other animals.

  Where the line becomed blurred or, in this case, stomped on, is when animals are treated cruelly their whole lives, only to end at a torturous, painful death.

  It's like asking someone, would you rather be shot in the head, or dipped in boiling water until you die? Which is more humane?

  Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
  The Children's Medical Center
  One Children's Plaza
  Dayton, OH 45404
  937-641-4293

  <snip>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to