of them) are at war with Israel, and all of them should be treated as enemy
>>soldiers, or there are some Palestineans who are terrorists and who are
attacking Israel. It can't be both. It's one or the other.
What about this? Some of the palestinians believe they are at war with
Israel, and in doing so can more easily justify their actions, while some of
them do not and really just want to live their lives in peace. I think alot
of people in any conflict would fall into the latter category.
sorry to interject.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Graeme [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 7:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re: al-qaeda and Iraq and the war
I'm not justifying the actions on any side. I'm simply saying that the
labels of "terrorist" and freedom fighter", "funding terror" and "aid
to victims" can get blurry based on bias.
Honestly, the whole thing makes me sick.
-Kevin
On Wed, 28 Jul 2004 22:51:17 -0400, Judith Dinowitz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So you're saying that the Palestinean attacks against Israeli civilians
(mostly) are an act of war, correct? If so, then Israel has every right, as
a country being attacked in war, to go and obliterate every Palestinean
fighter. You said so yourself -- it's war.
>
> And if it's not war, then the Palestineans attacking innocent civilians is
terrorism, and any support of terrorists is immoral.
>
> So your argument is false either way. Either the Palestinean people (all
of them) are at war with Israel, and all of them should be treated as enemy
soldiers, or there are some Palestineans who are terrorists and who are
attacking Israel. It can't be both. It's one or the other.
>
> Judith
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
