> Implied by the law? no way!
Implied by the Pledge itself. Including the text "under God" implies
that there is, in fact, at least one god, and probably only one God
(note capitilizaion) depending on interpretation.
--Ben
> > See there's a difference. You got in trouble for NOT SAYING IT. Now
> > that is something I am against! it's not the pledge of allegiance that
> > should be changed, but the people who are forcing you to say "under
> > God". Please don't take it out on the pledge of allegiance!
>
> There is still the implication that if I don't believe in God, I'm
> wrong. Not saying "under God" doesn't imply that believing in God is
> incorrect. At least that's the way I feel.
>
> --Ben
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- RE: Religious oppression in action Marlon Moyer
- RE: Religious oppression in action Jim Davis
- Re: Religious oppression in action brobborb
- Re: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- Re: Religious oppression in action brobborb
- Re: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- Re: Religious oppression in action brobborb
- Re: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- Re: Religious oppression in action brobborb
- RE: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- RE: Religious oppression in action Andy Ousterhout
- Re: Religious oppression in action Ben Doom
- RE: Religious oppression in action Jim Davis
- Re: Religious oppression in action Kevin Graeme
- Re: Religious oppression in action Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Religious oppression in action brobborb
- Re: Religious oppression in action Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Religious oppression in action Doug White
- need help Lori
- Re: need help--FIX Lori