biased. If you have any other sources that back up
your claim I’ll address it.
-sm
--- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what. That crud is completely irrelevant. The
> issue is the Shrub
> administration's heavy handed injection of a far
> right wing ideology
> into scientific research.
>
> You still have not addressed the facts in the
> document.
>
> Ideologues in review panels. Censoring of
> congressional reports.
> Removal of data from web sites. Political litmus
> tests for
> appointments to NIH and FDA panels. Ordering the
> EPA to censor air
> quality data immediately post 9/11. Appointment of
> completely
> unqualified people to important scientific panels.
>
> and those are just a few.
>
> Problem addressing the issues perhaps. Stop with the
> red herring and
> address the issue.
>
>
> On Tue, 3 Aug 2004 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT), Sam Morris
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Try this one:
> >
>
http://www.activistcash.com/organization_overview.cfm/oid/145
> >
> > The Union of Concerned Scientists was born out of
> a
> > protest against the war in Vietnam. In 1969, a
> group
> > of 48 faculty members at MIT -- the original
> "union"
> > -- sponsored a one-day work stoppage of scientific
> > research. A conference that coincided with the
> strike
> > included appearances from such notables as Noam
> > Chomsky (who is now recognized as a leader of the
> 21st
> > Century "hate-America left"); Eric Mann, who led
> the
> > 1960s terrorist Weather Underground; and Jonathan
> > Kabat, who argued: "We want capitalism to come to
> an
> > end."
> >
> > -sm
> >
> > --- "Larry C. Lyons" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Try this link from the Union of Concerned
> Scientists
> > > regarding how the
> > > current administration has been perverting the
> > > scientific advisory
> > > process by packing committees with ideological
> > > extremists,
> > > deliberately misrepresenting study reports to
> > > support the
> > > adminstration agenda, and suppressing evidence
> > > because of political
> > > policy decisions.
> > >
> > > Also note that this is an updated report from
> the
> > > one issued last February.
> > >
> > >
>
http://www.ucsusa.org/documents/RSI_final_fullreport.pdf
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> > http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
