lied, has obfuscated facts and distorted evidence, has actually committed war
crimes by unilaterally invading a sovereign country, ignored evidence to the
contrary and maintains that the country of Iraq has/had WMD, Chem/Bio weapons
and has/had alliances/connections to Al Q and other terrorists, and was an
imminent threat to the United States. That his family has/had extensive
financial and other connections with the Saudi Royal Family, including G HW Bush
(the father) being the Saudi Registered counsel in the US. is all to be
considered a democratic attack and therefore disregarded summarily? huh?
I guess all the "evidence" concerning the joblessness, falling stock market,
loss of savings by the middle class, and loss of retirement benefits, and loss
of or increased prescription drug coverage by seniors, is likewise to be
discarded as a Democratic attack?
Get real!
----- Original Message -----
From: Larry C. Lyons
As I said how can it be a function of the so-called democratic attack
machine when it happended in a foreign country. Get real.
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
