Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> Didn't mean for it to be so. Also didn't know you were so attached to
> Thunderbird. I don't get attached to a mail client. I think they all suck
> and none do all of the work I want. :(
It's not so much that I'm attatched. It's just that it's the only
client I've used that I haven't had tons of problems with. In fact, the
only time I had problems, there was a patch the next time I looked. The
spam filtering is nice and the rules are easy to use.
Something non-specific bothered me about Mozilla Mail. I dunno what it
was, but I just didn't like it.
If you've got a better suggestion, I'm all ears.
--Ben
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: email client that is light G
- Re: email client that is light Ben Doom
- Re: email client that is light Paul Ihrig
- Re: email client that is light Kevin Graeme
- Re: email client that is light Michael Dinowitz
- Re: email client that is light Ben Doom
- RE: email client that is light Michael Dinowitz
- RE: email client that is light Angel Stewart
- Re: email client that is light Ben Doom
- RE: email client that is ligh... Michael Dinowitz
- Re: email client that is ... Ben Doom
- Re: email client that is ... G
- Re: email client that is ... Kevin Graeme
- RE: email client that is light Erika L. Walker-Arnold
- RE: email client that is light Michael Dinowitz
- Re: email client that is light Ben Doom
- Re: email client that is light Robert Munn
- Re: email client that is light Paul Ihrig
- Re: email client that is light Chris Poterala
- RE: email client that is light Erika L. Walker-Arnold
- Re: email client that is light Paul Ihrig