A close friend's wife was a witness. At the time she was working
across the way in a office that had a very clear view of that side of
the Pentagon. She saw the airliner hit the Pentagon. When it happened
she phoned my friend, who was in the cubicle across from me. M.
sounded very hysterical and upset. In later conversations, she said
she saw no trucks near that side of the Pentagon.
larry
On Wed, 1 Sep 2004 10:29:03 -0400, S. Isaac Dealey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not certain I believe either of them really... They also don't
> make any comment about nearby video footage of the crash having been
> confiscated (and not subsequently released). Would be nice to see a
> film clip from one of the closed-circuit cameras in the area.
> Presumably these wouldn't be national secrets unless there were some
> legitimate reason to cover up what actually happened there. So while
> the snopes information makes a lot of sense, it's still not a complete
> picture. Who's to say that the "debris" photo the snopes site shows
> isn't staged? It would be very easy to place a random piece of garbage
> on the ground way back there and snap the photo to have something to
> show people and say "look! Debris from the plane!" It certainly
> doesn't seem to me from the photos like there's enough debris or
> damage from the wings ("blackened sections" to me is not absolute
> proof of a wing, given that blackness can be created by soot and fire)
> -- even if as they say, the wings folded inward during impact. That's
> admittedly not a professional opinion, it's just some schmuck looking
> at the photos. It just seems like an oddly symetrical hole given the
> situation.
>
> I'm not saying it's true - I'm also not saying it's a hoax. I'm just
> saying the information I've had about it seems to me like an
> incomplete enough picture to leave room for more than one possibility.
> If a magician can make a living making people see things that aren't
> real, then it's just _possible_ that what we're told happened at the
> pentagon isn't entirely true.
>
> > I never even thought to look there. I usually go there
> > once a week and just browse.
>
> > It's still pretty interesting...scary too...
>
> > Candace K. Cottrell, Web Developer
> > The Children's Medical Center
> > One Children's Plaza
> > Dayton, OH 45404
> > 937-641-4293
>
> > http://www.childrensdayton.org
>
> > "There is no right price for the wrong product, even if it
> > is inexpensive and delivered on time."
>
> >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 9/1/2004 9:18:19 AM >>>
>
> > sure have seen this, and all i can say is....what a load
> > of whooey.
>
> > again, i defer to snopes to set things straight:
> > http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Candace Cottrell
> > To: CF-Community
> > Sent: Wednesday, September 01, 2004 8:09 AM
> > Subject: Pentagon coverup?
>
> > Anyone seen this? Thoughts?
>
> > http://www.muchosucko.com/flash/pentagonlies.html#Main
>
> s. isaac dealey 954.927.5117
>
> new epoch : isn't it time for a change?
>
> add features without fixtures with
> the onTap open source framework
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=44477&DE=1
> http://www.sys-con.com/story/?storyid=45569&DE=1
> http://www.fusiontap.com
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
