--- "S. Isaac Dealey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > That's the point! If someone gave them bogus
> > information and they stood behind it wouldn't it
> clear
> > them if they gave the source? Why protect someone
> that
> > duped them anyway?
>
> Because letting people know the source will give him
> a reputation for
> revealing sources and likely result in not getting
> new sources in the
> future.

Not if the source pulled a fast one. They should send
the message that if you make stuff up that will ruin
their reputation they’ll expose you. Why protect them?

-sm


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 50x more storage than other providers!
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to