conclusions, that there is a steady adaptation to the environment as
evidenced by the progressive changes in for instance the legs and tail
of whales.
Claudistics is pretty obtuse, but so far its a good model. When the
pattern of evidence suggests otherwise then it gets tossed with only a
few regrets.
larry
On Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:52:52 -0400, Won Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 11:40 9/29/2004 -0400, you wrote:
> >When there is a clear record in the lab of the changes then that sows
> >the mechanism at work. There are clear examples from horses, whales,
> >humans, various birds etc. Read the sites I mentioned.
> >
> >larry
>
>
> Larry,
>
> I tried to read it. But quite frankly it is beyond my understanding. What
> I do know is this: I, personally, can not be certain that anything
> described in that voluminous text really happened. I did notice there is a
> lot of footnotes though. And it sure does look official. And this
> scientific method that they describe, well I'm not too sure what that means
> either. But I'm a ordinary joe from VA and I don't want the NOVA people
> picking on me. So I'm going to believe those fancy PhDs. They have to be
> good for something.
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
