Actually it doesn't. This declarative sentence states that a higher
ratio of Stewart listeners completed four years of college which does
not mean the same thing as 'there are more four year graduates viewing
Stewarts show'. There is not enough evidence in this particular
sentence to determine who has more or less. If you are going to be
pompous at least be right.
Larry C. Lyons wrote:
> Are you sure about that? You seem to have a problem with declarative
> sentances.
>
> "Viewers of Jon Stewart's show are more likely to have completed four
> years of college than people who watch "The O'Reilly Factor,"
> according to Nielsen Media Research."
>
> More likely means that there are more viewers of Jon Stewart's show
> who have a four year degree than O'Reilly viewers. Its really very
> simple elementary maths.
[Todays Threads]
[This Message]
[Subscription]
[Fast Unsubscribe]
[User Settings]
[Donations and Support]
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Jim Campbell
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Kevin Graeme
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again William Bowen
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again William Bowen
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Ray Champagne
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Chris Stoner
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Chris Stoner
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Larry C. Lyons
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Chris Stoner
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Gruss Gott
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again William Bowen
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again William Bowen
- Re: Bill O'Reilly, wrong again Sam Morris