> Andy wrote: > My problem is both of your willingness to state opinion as fact when reality > is so much more complicated. In many ways you are acting in the same > fashion that you accuse the man you dislike, which seems somewhat > disingenuous.
How about these facts then: 1.) General Shinseki spent decades in the military under both parties and was promoted to one of its highest ranks. This is material evidence that Gen. Shinseki was "Army material." 2.) Gen. Shinseki violated the unwritten rule - he publically broke ranks with the Pentagon. This is material evidence that Gen. Shinseki disagreed with the Pentagon and its Iraq policy. The question to you is, do you think a career military officer who publically broke ranks with the Pentagon was happy in his position? Do you think the Pentagon valued his opinion? If both answers are no then I'd say we're standing on firm ground. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Purchase from House of Fusion, a Macromedia Authorized Affiliate and support the CF community. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=36 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:133220 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
