> > Michael wrote: > > Should there be checks on all states where the exit polls differed greatly > > from the actual numbers? I don't see why not. > > Now THAT'S reasonable. It's in all American's interest to be > confident in our election process and sure about the result. This > isn't a partisan issue, it's an American issue.
So long as it's a privately funded, non-legislated action I would have no objection to a "post-mortem" review. However my concerns on the concept that it should be mandated and funded by the federal government. Remember, in Florida 2000 after three different newspapers spent something like 6 months doing an complete hand recount Bush still won the state and therefore the election. Hatton ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:135850 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
