Your always on the attack aren't you?

Willful ignorance? I've proven you wrong nearly every step of the way.
You always get quite when your wrong, then a few days later come back
with stupid comments like "there is hard data that solidly contradicts
his view".

What happened to the NY Times articles about Chinas missile system?
Silkworm? Remember that? I proved you 100% full of it and you mumbled
some nonsense in Canadian French.

Please provide me with an example of when you provided hard data that I ignored.



On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 10:45:42 -0500, Larry C. Lyons
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Its not a matter of providing a matter of different point of view etc.
> I welcome that. Rather what it is that his willful ignorance that
> bothers me. When there is hard data that solidly contradicts his view
> he ignores it or simply dismisses it. I have no tolerance for willing
> ignorance.
> 
> larry

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Sams Teach Yourself Regular Expressions in 10 Minutes  by Ben Forta 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=40

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:143502
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to