> Dana wrote: > 2) 19 judges have ruled - no, one has ruled, 18 others have said the > law was complied with. >
I've heard from several national experts who all disagree with you. Each of them, independent of the others, has explained the same basic thing: each judge had the ability to overturn the decision based on a "due diligence" type basis, i.e., did they think the original judge made his finding based on sufficient data. Put another way, the 19 judges did not rule solely on whether the first judge just followed the legal requirements, but also on the validity of his finding. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble Ticket application http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:151927 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
