> "May not be discriminated against due to race, religion, color, or creed."
I fully support any legislation discriminating against Creed fans. - Jim Gruss Gott wrote: >>Sam wrote: >>marriage is oppressing them. If civil unions give them the same >>rights what's the difference? Next thing you know they'll want to be >>referred to as normal relationships and heterosexual to be called >> >> > >The difference is that you have a right your fellow citizen is being >denied simply because of their gender preference. Which sounds like a >perfect addition to: > >"May not be discriminated against due to race, religion, color, or creed." > >There's no need to have 2 marriages unless there's a need to 2 water >fountains which, of course, there isn't. If we're "protecting >marriage" why not only allow hispanics to marry? After all, they have >the lowest divorce rate. > >The government should have no say in who I choose to marry and that >should be anyone I care to as long as that person is an adult of sound >mind. > >Civil unions is like saying this: > >"You've complained because even though you and I do the exact same job >you get paid 50% less. I'll tell you what: how about if you only get >paid 40% less?" > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Protect Your PC from viruses, hackers, spam and more. Buy PC-cillin with Easy Installation & Support http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=61 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:156832 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
