> SStewart wrote:
> I think this "trial" was a farce, I think the DA blew the case.

The DA didn't blow the case - they had no case.  Saying they blew it
imples there was damning evidence that didn't get to trial which
wasn't the case.  If anything I thought it was biased in the DA's
favor: they were allowed to admit evidence from past trials!

Show me the holes you see:

(1.)
"As for the testimony of the boy himself, Rodriguez said jurors were
troubled by the fact that the youngster's version of events was
inconsistent with testimony offered by other members of his family.

"It was really hard to believe what he was telling us," he said.

Jurors said they also were troubled by the logic of the prosecution's timeline.

Prosecutors said the molestation took place about three weeks after
Jackson and his associates allegedly launched a conspiracy against the
family to enlist their help in damage control efforts after the boy
was shown holding hands with the entertainer in an unflattering
television documentary."

(2.)
"I can't believe that this man could sleep in the same bedroom for 365
straight days and not do something more than just watch television and
eat popcorn," he said. "I mean that doesn't make sense to me, but that
doesn't make him guilty of the charges that were presented in this
case and that's where we had to make our decision."

(3.)
As they deliberated, jurors kept coming back to the "closetful of
evidence" supplied by prosecutors during the 14-week trial, but "it
was just not enough," said Juror No. 10, a 45-year-old woman from
Solvang, not far from Jackson's Neverland Ranch.

"We expected probably better evidence, something that was a little
more convincing. And it just wasn't there," she said.

Rodriguez said jurors did find credible some of the testimony relating
to past child molestation allegations against Jackson, which
prosecutors were allowed to introduce to try to prove a pattern of
behavior.

But he said that testimony wasn't enough to overcome the jury's doubts
about the facts in current case.

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/14/jackson.trial/index.html

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:160777
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to