It may be humanly *understandable.* But no, it isn't good, I agree. My
opinion is that he should have said kids, it's been fun, but I have to
go now. And exited stage right while getting people started on a
response.

Bush gets the benefit of the doubt way to often. What would I do? I
don't know, but I didn't run for president.

Dana

On 8/24/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Brian wrote:
> > Criticize the President for his actions in the months and years following
> > the tragedy, i'll be right there with ya....but calling his immediate
> > reaction in the minutes following a "revealing character moment", i just
> > don't think is accurate or fair.
> >
> 
> The nation is under attack - it doesn't matter if it's Russians,
> Cubans, Terrorists, etc.  And the President had no idea who it was at
> the time anyway.  The process is the same:  What, when, where, how,
> who's responding.
> 
> Have you ever heard of the Art of War?  It's used in business all of
> the time.  Why?  Because attack and defense are universal.
> 
> So you're clearly wrong.  I'm absolutely shocked that ANYONE would try
> to defend a leader who sits stupid for 7 minutes upon hearing his
> country is under attack.  If you are, then you deserve that leader.
> 
> BTW - if you ever want to get into computer security I wouldn't
> mention you think crises reaction time is situational.
> 
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Discover CFTicket - The leading ColdFusion Help Desk and Trouble 
Ticket application

http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=48

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:171015
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to