> Sam wrote: > None of the many witness were givin immunity. > The U.S. attorney's manual requires that prosecutors not bring witnesses before a grand jury if there is a possibility of future criminal charges unless the witnesses are notified in advance that their testimony can be used against them in a later indictment.
> If he didn't volunteer they could have subpoenaed him. Then he would > have to testify or use Presidential immunity. So? This president has made a habit of presidential power ala the energy policy meetings. His motto should be "so sue me." If Rove is innocent as the President claims he's told him numerous times, why take the risk of some bogus charge by repeatedly returning to court? ESPECIALLY when the prosecutor tells you he can no longer guarantee you won't be indicted? I could buy your argument if it was a single appearance accompanied by the customary lack of warning, but this is *totally* different. Dude. Seriously. Rove is an OJ. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:176819 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
