> RoMunn wrote: > Iraq will go well and we'll start to see a down-down in troop level by > mid-2006,
I agree, but I think that's stupid. We need to be adding more troops, not less, or pulling back to watch what happens ala Murtha. At *best*, from what I've read, we can expect Iraq to transition over the next 5 years into a loose federation of 3 groups. This is if all of the voting goes well, the politicians stop getting blown up, etc. And even with all of our troops there now, there's still plenty of killing of Iraqis. I just don't see how in 6 months they'll be in a position to handle it. WE can't even handle it NOW. So for all the talk by the President of not running Iraq policy by polls, I think that's exactly what he'll be doing by pulling troops out. He needs to adding, not pulling. And Iraq is going to be a mess for decades. He fekked up getting us in, and I don't see any positive outcome unless we're committed at larger than the current levels for at least a decade. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:187788 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
