I have to agree. In general these labels bore me but looking at the
following I have to say that if the Economist is liberal, then so is the
current administration:


   - gay marriage <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gay_marriage>: "Why
   should one set of loving, consenting adults be denied a right that other
   such adults have [...]?"
[2]<http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=2459758>
   - legal prostitution <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution>:
   "People should be allowed to buy and sell whatever they like, including
   their own bodies."
[3]<http://www.economist.com/opinion/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3151258>
   - legalizing drugs <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drugs> such as
   marijuana <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marijuana>
   - reducing agricultural <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture>
   subsidies <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsidy> in developed
nations<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Developed_nation>
   - turning Britain into a republic, (October 1994)
   - 2003 war in Iraq<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_invasion_of_Iraq>
   - immigration <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration> into western
   countries, (see, for example, the March 11, 2000 and July 2005 issues, among
   others)
   - stronger gun control <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gun_control> laws
   in the United States <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States>
[4]<http://www.economist.com/agenda/displaystory.cfm/none/PrinterFriendly.cfm?Story_ID=1936029>
   - Turkey <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turkey>'s application for
   membership of the European
Union<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Union>
   - space exploration by private organisations such as Scaled Composites
   SpaceShipOne<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scaled_Composites_SpaceShipOne>,
   instead of by NASA <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA> or the
ESA<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Space_Agency>
   - regulation by governments where an efficient market cannot or does
   not exist (e.g. environmental)
   - charitable donations by private individuals and governments but
   condemns most financial charity by
companies<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_Social_Responsibility>as
"borrowed virtue" (
   e.g. they support the fact that Bill
Gates<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Gates>,
   not Microsoft <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft>, is the world's
   most charitable non-governmental
body<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_%26_Melinda_Gates_Foundation>)

   - education vouchers <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Education_voucher>.


[edit<http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Economist_editorial_stance&action=edit&section=3>
]

Opposition

It has opposed:

   - the death penalty <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_punishment>
   - affirmative action <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Affirmative_action>
   - the 35-hour workweek <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/35-hour_workweek>
   - the establishment of a minimum
wage<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minimum_wage>in Britain
   - the economic policies of
Venezuela<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venezuela>'s
   President Hugo Chávez <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hugo_Ch%C3%A1vez>
   - the election and policies of Silvio
Berlusconi<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silvio_Berlusconi>
   - Robert Mugabe <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Mugabe>,
Zimbabwe<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimbabwe>'s
   president
   - the European
Constitution<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Constitution>
   - torture <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Torture> of any kind in any
   circumstance.




On 12/19/05, Gruss Gott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sam  wrote:
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Economist_editorial_stance
> >
>
> So you would say a libertarian is a lefty?  As your link says,
>
> "The Economist's roots [are derived from] classical liberalism,
> opposing government interference in either social or economic
> activity"
>
> In this country that's called libertarian - that is, far right.
>
> 

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support 
efficiency by 100%
http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49

Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:188844
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to