Well, as long as it's CF 7, and you can migrate the byte code, you're not really fibbing right?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 5:21 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Why is coldfusion better. > > Nick, > > We had the same problem with a major client, so the thing is > that we told a small fib by a technical means only. We told > them that the application will be deployed on a J2EE server > running java code. We didn't tell them that the code was > written using Coldfusion, or don't people think that way > logically anymore? > > > Regards > Andrew Scott > Analyst Programmer > > CMS Transport Systems > Level 2/33 Bank Street > South Melbourne, Victoria, 3205 > > Phone: 03 9699 7988 - Fax: 03 9699 7976 > > Quote: > ....the myth of socialism is far stronger than the reality of > capitalism. > That is because capitalism is not really an ism at all. It is > what people do if you leave them alone. - Arnold Beichmen, > Hoover Institute Fellow > -------------------------------------------------------------- > -------------- > -------------------------- > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, 25 January 2006 7:16 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Why is coldfusion better. > > Rapid development isn't as important as you think, not to a > customer. They want something done using a technology they > have heard of. > > I have seen it time and time again. When you make a bid to a > customer quoting a CF site that it done faster and cheaper, > vs. a .NET site that takes longer and costs more, the > customer will get the .NET site, or Java. > > Why, because they have heard of them, major companies at the > front of development technologies are supporting them. > > Allaire, Macromedia, Adobe, not names that make a company > think development technology. When people hear Macromedia > they thing Flash, when people hear adobe they think Acrobat. > > We lost bids for that very reason, that was the driving force > that caused my old company to go away from CF. > > When we started selling pre-packaged apps, the same thing > came up. We can sell it with .NET for $500, all they need is > a windows server. Or we could sell it for $1,700 with CF > Server. Often companies wouldn't want to put CF Server onto > their .NET server. > > CF is a great language, but Rapid Development is nowhere near > the top of my list of important things when picking a language. > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:194119 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
