On 3/2/06, Vivec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "These have how many living survivors? The Sudan is a
> genocide now and there are still survivors (for the moment) and it's not
> being done by white men but by Muslims."
>
> Quite true. And the race and ethnicity of those pepetrating the
> genocide forms absolutely no part of my argument. Although I'm not
> surprised that this is a portion of my examples which so many have
> chosen to put under the spotlight.
>
> The Holocaust, however, is treated differently than any other event of
> genocide and every other attrocity in history. The laws are different,
> and the penalties are usually harsher in all areas. There is a far
> greater backlash.
>
> The reasons for this that have been put forward so far are :
>
> 1) it happened in our century, and there are living survivors. But
> we've already seen that there are living survivors of several other
> atrocities, some in this very decade far less century.
>
> 2) Certain countries equate any questioning of the holocaust to a Hate
> Crime by default, and this is not the case in other countries.
> However, the backlash for such statements is usualy disproportionate
> in most countries of the world when compared to the backlash for other
> racist, ethnic, or religious 'hate' speech.

Ity also happens the other way as well. Currently in Turkey it is a
crime to suggest that there was an Armenian holocaust, or that in the
1990's there was efforts to ethnically cleans the Kurds from their
homeland areas along the Turkish/Iranian/Iraqi border.
>
> Neither of these reasons really explain why the curtailment of Freedom
> of Speech, or the general acceptance that publishing such items is by
> default Irresponsible is so widely accepted in the case of Jews and
> the Holocaust, but no such high degree of recognition of
> irresponsibility occurs in any of several other examples of
> insensitivity,bigotry, genocide or racism.


Again, do you agree that there are cases for the legitimate
curtailment of the freedom of speech or not. For instance, what about
yelling fire in a crowded theater?

larry
--
Your representative owes you, not his industry only, but his judgment;
and he betrays instead of serving you if he sacrifices it to your
opinion.

Edmond Burke

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:198625
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5
Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54

Reply via email to