No, I was saying that if all of Britain was of the same mind as you during WWII the Germans would've met no resistance and taken over the entire country.
Am I wrong? Wayne Putterill wrote: > Your valid point was an attempt at an insult, yes I responded to your insult > with another flippant insult, but that's life. > > On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Glad I make you smile Wayne, but um...stiupid? Does that really elevate >> past 5 years old either? >> >> I had a valid point, and you called me stupid, so I just responded in >> terms you would understand. >> >> >> >> >> Wayne Putterill wrote: >> >>> You do make me smile when you try to be insulting, it's like being >>> >> attacked >> >>> by a five year old :) >>> >>> On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> I suppose that's better than your height of pussy. I'm guessing the >>>> Germans would've improved your families gene pool. >>>> >>>> You get what you give there Waynie, tit for tat. >>>> >>>> >>>> Wayne Putterill wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> Just what the conversation needed . six foot seven of stupid :) >>>>> >>>>> On 3/17/06, Kevin Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Wayne, just be glad your fellow countrymen a generation ago didn't >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> "grow >>>> >>>> >>>>>> out", otherwise, you'd probably be speaking German. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Wayne Putterill wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not anti american, I'm anti anyone who makes this world a worse >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> place to be. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not bashing america, my own country had a large part in this >>>>>>> disgusting affair. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> As for calling me antisemetic, anyone who knows me would laugh out >>>>>>> loud at that - particularly my jewish friends. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I would lay down my life for something I believed in, but I grew out >>>>>>> of playing with guns when I started wearing long trousers. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> There were no weapons found, there is no was to ever prove they did >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> or >>>> >>>> >>>>>> did >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> not exist at this point. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> BTW Why is that "spin"? Are all of my statements true? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How about you stop with America bashing bullshit? And the >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> anti-Semitic >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> bullshit that you lefties like to spout. It makes me sick. How >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>> about >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> instead of sitting around bitching you actually stand for >>>>>>>> >> something, >> >>>>>>>> >>>>>> with >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>> not only your principles, but your life on the line? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> Tim Heald >>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>> 703-300-3911 >>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 11:51 AM >>>>>>>> To: CF-Community >>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> how about you actually deal with the point being discussed instead >>>>>>>> >> of >> >>>>>>>> spouting another load of spin. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 3/17/06, Loathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How about the violations of the cease fire? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How about the UN resolutions allowing us to use force to enforce >>>>>>>>> >> the >> >>>>>>>>> sanctions that were being violated? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How about the attacks against American Aircraft? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> How about the fact that oil is actually of vital importance to the >>>>>>>>> national security of the United States? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> Tim Heald >>>>>>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>> 703-300-3911 >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>> From: Wayne Putterill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 3:16 AM >>>>>>>>> To: CF-Community >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> That's what blows all the "this means we were right to go in" >>>>>>>>> arguments apart. We had ways of finding out if he did have WMD and >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>> the >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>> UK and US governments didn't let the people involved finish their >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>> work. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 3/17/06, Larry C. Lyons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Just a reminder the people on the ground, the UN inspectors who >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>> were >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>> in Iraq, and the IAEA always said that there were no WMD's. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 3/16/06, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> When you have your own guys, plus other countries all agreeing >>>>>>>>>>> that they have them, then the risk factor seems within the >>>>>>>>>>> >> bounds. >> >>>>>>>>>>> If you try it and you turn out wrong, then people second guess, >>>>>>>>>>> which is good if it makes us better, but when the point is just >>>>>>>>>>> >> to >> >>>>>>>>>>> belittle then it doesn't help anybody. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Were mistakes made? Clearly. However I don't think they could >>>>>>>>>>> >> have >> >>>>>>>>>>> done this any other way. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>>>>>>> From: Gruss Gott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2006 7:13 PM >>>>>>>>>>>> To: CF-Community >>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Saddam Pretended to have Weapons to prevent Attack >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dino wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Israel only attacked Iraq when they were building a nuclear >>>>>>>>>>>>> reactor >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> for >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> express purpose of gaining nukes to attack Israel. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Combine that with what gMoney said and you have: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 1.) If we thought there was a threat, why didn't we just bomb >>>>>>>>>>>> the shit out of it w/o having to go in? Lame Answer: mobile >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> labs. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apparently REALLY mobile. So mobile they don't exist. Which >>>>>>>>>>>> brings >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> us to ... >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2.) Why don't we know how reliable our intelligence is? From >>>>>>>>>>>> the beginning the whole everybody-thought-blah-blah-blah >>>>>>>>>>>> >> strikes >> >>>>>>>>>>>> me as absolutely moronic. It's called risk management - I know >>>>>>>>>>>> they offer classes at HBS on the topic. Bush must've skipped >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>> them. >>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Whenever you have intelligence you have a reliability factor on >>>>>>>>>>>> it. Either ours was low and we went in anyway or we haven't >>>>>>>>>>>> learned shit about intelligence in the last 50 years. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:200512 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
