She said publicly that the FBI failed to listen to her and get the warrants she asked for. What really happened was they reviewed her information, sent it to legal at many levels and they all decided they didn't have enough to get the FISA warrant because he wasn't connected to a recognized foreign power. They couldn't search his laptop using domestic laws because they didn't have probable cause. Point is she's not a whistleblower; she's a rogue agent that thinks she knew better than everyone else, happens all the time. If she were actually good at what she did she would have presented a better case and tried different venues to get warrants rather than saying, "this will work" then wondering why it didn't. Personally I don't want to defend the FBI because I do think they dropped the ball, just not here.
On 5/18/06, Dana Tierney wrote: > fine -- do you think you could explain to me what Coleen Rowly is wrong about > without posting a link to the report of the 9-11 COmmission and letting me > guess? > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207056 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
