Deep in the weeds? You're shitting me :) You get all your so-called facts from your gut feelings that Bush is an idiot. Almost everything you claim can easily be disproved by REAL facts, not hunches. You are always in the weeds because you don't use facts and always personally attack people when they call you on it. When I bash you with my "perceived facts", I always back them with reputable sources. You on the other hand always come out with; "well I know three people from ___ and they all say ___." Just because you can't find facts to support your vitriol doesn't mean that facts disproving them are automatically dismissible.
Now here you are bashing me while telling me not to bash people, get off your high horse and have look at yourself. On 5/18/06, Gruss Gott wrote: > > Sam wrote: > > Nice going, he mocks you so you mock me? > > > > Well, to be fair, you do tend to get deep in the weeds and then bash > people with your perceived facts. You should remember that: > > 1.) None of us have all of the facts to prove anything political which > means that, > 2.) Trying to mentally bash people with your facts will not get you anywhere. > > In general, we'd all get a lot farther if we tried to stay > philosophical rather than quibble over an incomplete set of facts. > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:207066 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
