I'm not saying what they are, you posted a url with a bunch of arab names with zero context, and the list contained zero context I asked what the list was.
I was simply trying to get more information; I'm not trying to really defend anything. I just wanted to know. As for the constitutional rights, I'm still not sure what rights they are taking away from US citizens. I haven't heard of anything new that this Administration is doing that others haven't been doing. And why it is so different when it is this one. Back to the list that brought me so many questions, Are there other charges still pending for these people? Did they testify against others in exchange for reduced charges? Or is it just yet another list that contains a minimal amount of information that proves nothing to any side? > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, June 05, 2006 7:57 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > I am saying that the Washington Post obtained a list of alleged terrorists > and tracked the outcome of those cases. That is what I posted. One of you > says they weren't ever supposed to be terrorists and that is why the > actual convictions were for immigration issues. The other of you says yes > but some of them were. Not a real coherent defense to what amounts to > proof of more deception. > > Here is what I think -- I think that immigration violations are important > but that using the Patriot Act to prosecute them is rather like scratching > an itch by shooting a bullet at it. I STILL think the current > administration is an imminent threat to your constitutional rights. If you > choose not to be concerned about that, what can I say? By the time people > are disappearing off the street, Robert, it will be legal for them to do > so. Hey, it's currently legal to kidnap Arab men and take them to > countries where they will be tortured. The fact that you don't see > anything wrongwith that leaves me speechless. > > > > >A bunch of them ARE terrorists. Another bunch are common criminals. What > is > >the problem, do you not want our government to catch terrorists? > > > >On 6/4/06, Dana wrote: > >> > >> not the same as saying they are innocent, of course... but given that > >> these are supposed to be terrorists... > >> > > > >-- > >--------------- > >Robert Munn > >www.funkymojo.com > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:208131 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
