But couldn't it have been a bad statistical model? > -----Original Message----- > From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, June 14, 2006 7:54 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: So, does anyone still trust these guys? > > you passed over a statement like this to focus on a 6% discrepancy? Who > says the women voted Democratic? From the wikipedia article: > > "Voting locations that used electronic or other types of voting machines > that did not issue a paper receipt or offer auditability correlate > geographically with areas that had discrepancies in Bush's favor between > exit poll numbers and actual results. Exit polling data in these areas > show significantly higher support for Kerry than actual results > (potentially outside the margin of error). From a statistical perspective, > this may be indicative of vote rigging, because the likelihood of this > happening by chance is extremely low. A study of 16 states by a former MIT > mathematics professor places the likelihood at 1 in 50,000. [9]"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209405 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
