Exactly to a T what i've been saying all along. Makes perfect sense, is fair, and fixes all the problems of the current system.
On 6/15/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > in the end it's a simple legal contract that has little to do with > religion. > > From the states point of view, exactly. That's why the fairest solution > to me is to separate the religious "Marriage" from the state Contract. Give > the state contract a new name that applies to everybody. Then it is > completely in individual choice. One can get a "Marriage" from their > religious organization of choice that would have no state contractual > binding. And/Or one could get the state contract that provides the legal > benefits but has no religious binding. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209450 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54