Not to be a stickler, but why does the church get to "keep" the term Marriage?
G Money wrote: > Exactly to a T what i've been saying all along. Makes perfect sense, is > fair, and fixes all the problems of the current system. > > On 6/15/06, Ian Skinner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> in the end it's a simple legal contract that has little to do with >> religion. >> >> From the states point of view, exactly. That's why the fairest solution >> to me is to separate the religious "Marriage" from the state Contract. Give >> the state contract a new name that applies to everybody. Then it is >> completely in individual choice. One can get a "Marriage" from their >> religious organization of choice that would have no state contractual >> binding. And/Or one could get the state contract that provides the legal >> benefits but has no religious binding. >> > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:5:209451 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
