well I think there has to be a fetus that does not live in order for fetal cells to be used, right? But the thinking is that stem cell research will cause *more* abortions? Cause I don't quite see that. Or if it is simply that a fetus is life and therefore you cannot use its parts then why are transplants ok? I am just not sure I see where the positions are.
> I have not said anything about stem cells because I've been busy and > because, to be honest, I did not exect any kind of legislation to ever > pass to get to the veto stage. > > But here we are, andmy question is -- the opposition to stem cell > research comes from some secret conviction that if it is allowed women > will deliberately conceive so they can sell the fetuses? Is that it? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Introducing the Fusion Authority Quarterly Update. 80 pages of hard-hitting, up-to-date ColdFusion information by your peers, delivered to your door four times a year. http://www.fusionauthority.com/quarterly Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/message.cfm/forumid:5/messageid:211623 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:5 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.5
